Friday's Digest - Issue #24 

Do Doctors need a Master's or PhD? 

Whether you're a dental student, medical student, or already a doctor,
you may contemplate going for a PhD or MSc.
Is it worth it?

February 3rd, 2023

Friday's Digest - The Newsletter for Doctors & Scientists

For two decades, I've been developing tools that have improved my practice in medicine, dentistry, and scientific research.

Join me every Friday to discover a new tool you can integrate into your workflow as a doctor, a scientist, or both.

I believe in sharing knowledge, embracing automation, boosting productivity, and finding joy in the process.

Table of contents


Preface

I would like to kick off this week’s newsletter with a big thank you for all the great feedback on last week’s newsletter. It was nice to see how game-changing it was for so many people to see the “Shay up-to-date OS” system at work. 💻

Please use this link to access the guide, as I continue to update it.

I’ll take this opportunity to answer repeating questions I got this week:


This week I reflected on the things that make our lives easy here:


However, there’s no place like home… 🇮🇱


Today we’ll discuss whether dentists and physicians should pursue research degrees. I started my research journey 15 years ago with an MSc and graduated with a PhD. I traveled half the globe to become a research fellow, and nowadays I’m a mentor.

Today I’ll share what I’ve learned.

Number 24! Let’s go.


"Taking the easy way out or telling the truth - those are not merely two different choices. They are different pathways through life. They are utterly different ways of existing."
— Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life.


Main Article

Storytime!

🍼 At 27, I thought my future plans were all laid out.

As a 3rd year dental student, I was almost done with my preclinical studies, and about to embark on the clinical part of dental school.

I was 3 and a half years from becoming a dentist 🦷, saying bye-bye to my student status for good.


And then everything changed.


It was no less than a butterfly effect 🦋, change-your-life moment kind of thing.

The head of the research program gave us a talk on the importance of double-credentialed investigators (DMD-PhD), and invited us to apply.

At that moment I KNEW that this is what I want to do.

Back then, double-credentialed dentists weren’t common, so the reaction I got from my surroundings wasn’t supportive 🤪. It’s quite understandable since none of them knew what it meant. But I trusted my gut feeling.


I took three years off from dental school. 🌅


My first year was challenging. I had many time-consuming graduate courses, and I had to squeeze them all while developing basic lab skills. Throughout my first year, I was heavily dependent on my labmates, and experiments took me forever. ♾️

In my second year, I became less dependent, and by its end, I completed my Masters's degree. 🎓


I could have stopped my research training there, as most of my classmates did.

I already knew how to run experiments, write abstracts, and prepare manuscripts. But if I ran into problems (in research, you ALWAYS run into problems), I didn’t know how to troubleshoot them.

I was an excellent lab worker, but not an investigator.

And then came the third year.

🤽‍♂️I became completely independent, designed my own experiments, and managed to troubleshoot my problems. The discussions I had with my mentor related to the essence of experiments and less to technicalities.

This year energized me so much that I spent long hours in the lab, and it was worth it.

I felt like a true investigator. 🕵️‍♀️


Fast forward, I’m 37.

By that time I completed dental school and earned my PhD, and I'm halfway through OMFS residency.

🧑‍🔧I’m sitting in a keynote talk about head and neck cancer immunotherapy at the international conference of oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

I was mind-blown. Seeing the (very preliminary) results was more than enough for me to know that this is my destiny.


Shortly after, I found my department chief and told him that Portland, Oregon is where I should be. As always, he supported me and paved the way.

🇺🇸 Fast forward, I’m 39, and I’m a research fellow at Providence Cancer Institute in Portland, Oregon, USA.

This lab was love at first sight, and my mentors were a pleasure to work with. 🍻

As for my scientific experience, that time had an enormous impact on the investigator I am today. And I couldn’t have accomplished it all without having years of experience as a PhD.


Looking back at that 27-year-old, naively sitting in an introductory talk about the DMD-PhD track, makes me smile.

That 27-year-old, hoping that someday his PhD journey will get him somewhere. Not knowing that this decision will allow him to embark on his life calling a decade later.


“Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes.”
— Oscar Wilde


So let’s discuss it.

First of all, there’s a huge difference between a Master’s and PhD.

Second of all, you need to decide if you need it.


During my training, I pursued both degrees. In recent years, I started to mentor students in both the MSc and PhD tracks. So let’s put this experience into practice and discuss four main factors:


Let’s start:


"Persistence matters more than talent. The student with straight As is irrelevant if the student sitting next to them with Bs has more passion."
— Timothy Ferriss, Tribe of Mentors


OMFS World

👩‍🎓For the student - Once you decided that you want to go for a Master's or PhD, the most important thing to do is to go “shopping”. Shopping is the process of going from lab to lab until you find the right one for you.
I suggest you do it as follows:
a. Read online about the labs and mentors.
b. Send emails to all the mentors who seem relevant to you. The email should be short and include your goals, the time you intend to invest, and your CV.
c. Meet with the mentors, and choose the mentor with whom you felt a “click”, and excitement.


🩺For the non-MD medical professional - Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule is a tool designed to help guide clinical decision-making for a pediatric head injury. It is a widely used evidence-based practice tool for evaluating children with an acute head injury and deciding on the need for computed tomography (CT) or observation.

For ages less than 2 years, CT is indicated if there is altered mental status, GCS<15, and palpable skull fracture. Observation or CT are indicated in severe mechanism of injury, non-frontal hematoma, and loss of consciousness for more than 5 seconds. For children older than 2 years and for more details, read here.


Stuff

📱Application I use - Inoreader is an innovative and powerful application designed to help you stay up-to-date with the latest news, trends, and topics. It is a great tool to help you curate content from multiple sources, customize your feeds, and organize your information in one convenient location. I use it solely for research. It automatically pulls head and neck cancer manuscripts from PubMed, so with a press of a button I can read them on my phone. Refer to Issue number 23 where I describe step-by-step how I do it.

💡Gear I use - Fisher Space Pen developed by Paul Fisher was designed to be used in zero gravity conditions and has been tested and approved by NASA for use in every manned mission since Apollo 7 in 1968. I really like the Telescoping Space Pen version, and I've used the same pen for the last 4 years. It's extremely robust and its telescoping design guarantees it won't open in your pocket. Regarding its price - I bought it for 23$, and its current price (38$) looks a bit too much to me. However, if you can find it for under 30$, I think it's totally worth it.

Epilogue

That’s it for this issue.

If you enjoyed this issue and haven’t subscribed yet, you can do so by clicking below.

Subscribing is free, and it will be sent to your email every Friday.

Have a great weekend!

Shay


My Workflow for Reading & Writing Manuscripts

I stopped using Acrobat Reader and Microsoft Word, and never looked back!
This is how I use Notion and Readwise Reader.